https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1205.0293/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20928899urn:hackerpapers:mention:1205.0293:20928899Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:55:25 GMT<p>Yeah, I mean, at this scale you’re not going to prove how nature is from any of this. What MWI is saying is that if you admit a really difficult view of the cosmos, then you can regard the Born rule as part of Schrödinger evolution—but it is kind of only possible because you punted the details into that difficult view of the cosmos. (And then the MWI-supporters come in full force and argue that actually the view is not so “difficult” after all.) Backing up, the problem is that you have these different approaches—depending on how you count them you could maybe group them broadly and say there…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1205.0293/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>quant-ph