<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Support for the thermal origin of the Pioneer anomaly · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1204.2507/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1204.2507/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Support for the thermal origin of the Pioneer anomaly — mentioned by nonbel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17006127</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1204.2507:17006127</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2018 12:17:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#x27;s an interesting case because they &amp;quot;solved&amp;quot; the problem by basically increasing the estimated uncertainty. See the dual sets of error bars in Fig 3: https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2507&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1204.2507/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>Support for the thermal origin of the Pioneer anomaly — mentioned by acqq</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13543890</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1204.2507:13543890</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 19:12:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; could explain e.g., the Pioneer anomaly The reason for the Pioneer anomaly is considered known since 2012: https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2507&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1204.2507/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
