<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A river model of space · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1204.0419/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1204.0419/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A river model of space — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44479697</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1204.0419:44479697</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2025 11:14:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The &amp;quot;river model&amp;quot; you mean isn&amp;#x27;t very general, as one eventually becomes interested gravitating systems where there isn&amp;#x27;t a suitable congruence, e.g. in close binary compact objects. In such systems, one has to add terms analogous to turbulence, frustrating calculability (and the development of relativistic intuition). It also doesn&amp;#x27;t deal well with tides: for example, Schwarzschild infaller worldlines (even on a body like the moon, where there is no horizon) on widely separated radial trajectories converge in a way that is unlike the confluences of rivers and their tributaries. These models…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1204.0419/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>A river model of space — mentioned by fargolime</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6103886</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1204.0419:6103886</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:03:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Keep in mind these descriptions are just interpretations of observations. Another intelligent civilization could explain the observations in a wholly different way. The observations show that light is affected by gravity (more precisely, by centers of gravitational attraction) the same as material objects are. We have alternate generally accepted ways of looking at this, such as the river model of space [1], where space is moving inward toward a center of gravitational attraction, carrying along in its &amp;quot;current&amp;quot; everything including light rays. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.0419&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1204.0419/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
