<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evolution of magnetic protection in potentially habitable terrestrial planets · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1204.0275/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1204.0275/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Evolution of magnetic protection in potentially habitable terrestrial planets — mentioned by WilliamDhalgren</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12355271</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1204.0275:12355271</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:07:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;well, you need rotation to create a dynamo, and these rotate rather slowly; once per orbit only. Now, it does seem this is still quite fast enough to produce a dynamo, but still the issue is whether it can still be strong enough to create a sufficient magnetosphere to save the atmosphere from completely eroding away, given both how close and how active Proxima Cent. is . Here&amp;#x27;s a paper that tries to see how much atmosphere planets in habitable zones around red dwarfs could lose given the activity of the star and the magnetosphere they could produce: - http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.0275 . I guess…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1204.0275/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.EP</category></item></channel></rss>
