HackerPapers

arXiv:1203.5813quant-ph

Quantum computing and the entanglement frontier

John Preskill

Abstract

Quantum information science explores the frontier of highly complex quantum states, the "entanglement frontier." This study is motivated by the observation (widely believed but unproven) that classical systems cannot simulate highly entangled quantum systems efficiently, and we hope to hasten the day when well controlled quantum systems can perform tasks surpassing what can be done in the classical world. One way to achieve such "quantum supremacy" would be to run an algorithm on a quantum computer which solves a problem with a super-polynomial speedup relative to classical computers, but there may be other ways that can be achieved sooner, such as simulating exotic quantum states of strongly correlated matter. To operate a large scale quantum computer reliably we will need to overcome the debilitating effects of decoherence, which might be done using "standard" quantum hardware protected by quantum error-correcting codes, or by exploiting the nonabelian quantum statistics of anyons realized in solid state systems, or by combining both methods. Only by challenging the entanglement frontier will we learn whether Nature provides extravagant resources far beyond what the classical world would allow.

arXiv comments
18 pages, 8 figures. Rapporteur talk at the 25th Solvay Conference on Physics ("The Theory of the Quantum World"), 19-22 October 2011. (v2): References added. (v3): Typo corrected
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics cond-mat.str-elStrongly Correlated Electrons

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Oct 2017 to Oct 2019.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

    • Oh, my. IBM is way lower than I thought. Thank you for setting my perception straight; I amended GP accordingly. I would almost qualify that as intellectual self-subjection (and perhaps ethical, in the way of science). Aiming so low that it's trolling, for lack of a better word.…

      K0SM0SView on HNParent context

    • > however, despite other interesting finds in the paper (such as being able to collapse state and read output from multiple qubits at once), claiming quantum supremacy feels to me to be somewhat aggrandising and disingenuous, given what the quantum circuit was actually computing…

      reikonomushaView on HNParent context

    • Referring to the point where quantum computers are better at one esoteric thing that's not even useful as a "singularity" is laughably atrociously ridiculous. The actual relevant technical term is "quantum supremacy" [1], which is already misleading (implies complete dominance…

      StrilancView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.