<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Are motorways rational from slime mould's point of view? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1203.2851/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1203.2851/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Are motorways rational from slime mould's point of view? — mentioned by royhodgman</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3971504</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1203.2851:3971504</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:44:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Arxiv has a paper by Andrew Adamatzky (one of the authors of the nytimes article) called &amp;quot;Are motorways rational from slime mould’s point of view?&amp;quot;, from 13 Mar 2012, which has pictures: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.2851.pdf Take a look at page 4.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1203.2851/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.PS</category></item><item><title>Are motorways rational from slime mould's point of view? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3728933</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1203.2851:3728933</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:48:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Slime molds choices of the most rational motorways&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1203.2851/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.PS</category></item></channel></rss>
