HackerPapers

arXiv:1202.2638cs.DL

Scienceography: the study of how science is written

Graham Cormode, S. Muthukrishnan, Jinyun Yan

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Scientific literature has itself been the subject of much scientific study, for a variety of reasons: understanding how results are communicated, how ideas spread, and assessing the influence of areas or individuals. However, most prior work has focused on extracting and analyzing citation and stylistic patterns. In this work, we introduce the notion of 'scienceography', which focuses on the writing of science. We provide a first large scale study using data derived from the arXiv e-print repository. Crucially, our data includes the "source code" of scientific papers-the LaTEX source-which enables us to study features not present in the "final product", such as the tools used and private comments between authors. Our study identifies broad patterns and trends in two example areas-computer science and mathematics-as well as highlighting key differences in the way that science is written in these fields. Finally, we outline future directions to extend the new topic of scienceography.

arXiv comments
13 pages,16 figures. Sixth International Conference on FUN WITH ALGORITHMS, 2012
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.DLDigital Libraries

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 3 HN submissions from Feb 2012 to May 2014. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.