<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Entropic-gravity derivation of MOND · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.4160/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.4160/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Entropic-gravity derivation of MOND — mentioned by jessriedel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13198769</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1201.4160:13198769</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 02:20:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Huh? The topic of the newscientist article is https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03034 (it links to the PDF right at the bottom!) and in the preprint&amp;#x27;s references section is &amp;quot;Verlinde, E. P., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1611.02269)&amp;quot;, which is surely the &amp;quot;Verlinde&amp;#x27;s theory of Emergent Gravity&amp;quot; that Brouwer et al. mean. The evidence in Brouwer et al. is shaky, and I am not a fan of Verlinde&amp;#x27;s paper (although it is interesting), but I don&amp;#x27;t see what it has to do with MOND. Indeed, in Brouwer et al., I can&amp;#x27;t even see a reference to MOND. Yea, I&amp;#x27;m well aware of all this. Brouwer et al. are jumping on the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.4160/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
