<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>High optical absorption in graphene · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.3071/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.3071/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>High optical absorption in graphene — mentioned by dm2</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7614667</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1201.3071:7614667</guid><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 20:48:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Some graphene facts that I&amp;#x27;ve found after a few minutes of research: - One million times thinner than paper, one atom thick, it&amp;#x27;s considered a 2D material. http://www.chemistryviews.org/details/ezine/4976821/Is_Graph... - Strongest material, stronger than diamond. http://engineering.columbia.edu/even-defects-graphene-strong... - Scotch tape was used to create a piece of graphene only 10 layers thick (I&amp;#x27;m guessing that means ~10 atoms thick? wow) - Moves electrons ~200 times faster than silicon: http://www.samsungvillage.com/blog/2012/05/18/samsungblog-sa... - Transparent, only absorbs 2.3% of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.3071/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.optics</category></item></channel></rss>
