<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>What does a large deviation look like? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.1232/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.1232/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>What does a large deviation look like? — mentioned by b215826</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26599025</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1201.1232:26599025</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2021 01:30:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;In this spirit, I really like this disclaimer from the conclusion of a preprint on the arXiv [1]: &amp;gt; This paper is not intended for journal publication. Therefore, it lacks the delusional claims typically found in published papers about its (simultaneous) relevance to drug design, nanoelectronics, photonics, spintronics or any other fashionable application. Also, everyone can sleep at peace without worrying about missed citations and their h-index (and without e-mailing me to complain about them). [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.1232v3&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.1232/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.stat-mech</category></item></channel></rss>
