<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Complexity Classification in Infinite-Domain Constraint Satisfaction · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.0856/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.0856/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Complexity Classification in Infinite-Domain Constraint Satisfaction — mentioned by cevi</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38774782</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1201.0856:38774782</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2023 19:00:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This may only be tangentially related, but you might be interested in the recent research on Qualitative Constraint Satisfaction Problems - a good introduction to the topic is Manuel Bodirsky&amp;#x27;s habilitation thesis [1]. The purpose of the subject is, roughly speaking, to exhaustively characterize all types of reliable reasoning which can be carried out efficiently - some people say they are searching for &amp;quot;a logic for P&amp;quot;. The techniques used are a mix of ideas from model theory, universal algebra, Ramsey theory, and computer science. Given the ridiculously ambitious scope of the project, I…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1201.0856/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item></channel></rss>
