<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.6209/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.6209/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning — mentioned by visarga</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10125936</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1112.6209:10125936</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:49:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Nope. Here&amp;#x27;s the link to the paper Google team published in 2002. Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6209 From the abstract: Contrary to what appears to be a widely-held intuition, our experimental results reveal that it is possible to train a face detector without having to label images as containing a face or not. The Cat detection thing was just a side product of learning to identify features of things in an unsupervised manner, but the news outlets locked on to that with titles such as &amp;quot;How Many Computers to Identify a Cat?…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.6209/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning — mentioned by nl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6911307</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1112.6209:6911307</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:34:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;But Google is (historically) a software company, so we should compare its contributions in the software field at the moment. Here&amp;#x27;s a random list: Page Rank Map/Reduce Statistical Language Translation Unsupervised image feature extraction[1] Go Dart Large scale software defined networking. The list could go on.. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6209&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.6209/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning — mentioned by kdavis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6445619</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1112.6209:6445619</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:39:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The &amp;quot;state of the art&amp;quot; they reference is SVM&amp;#x27;s trained on color and texture features. Pre deep belief network I&amp;#x27;d agree with your guess on convolutional neural networks. However, now I&amp;#x27;d guess you&amp;#x27;d use a deep belief network to create a network that would pick out better features than those picked out &amp;quot;by hand&amp;quot; in the convolutional neural network. (See for example [1][2]) So my money would be on some deep belief network. [1] Hinton, G. E, Osindero, S., and Teh, Y. W. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18:1527-1554. [2] Building high-level features…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.6209/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning — mentioned by varelse</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6302802</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1112.6209:6302802</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:54:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Given the 15.8% success rate of the cat detector on large data sets: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.6209.pdf&amp;amp;embedded=true, My chief worry is overconfidence from hopelessly technologically ignorant bureaucrats combined with a slew of false negatives and false positives when applied to human faces on general surveillance feeds. In contrast, driver&amp;#x27;s license, ID, and arrest photos are at least severely constrained input filters wherein a single individual is placed against relatively uncomplicated background pixels and the face is in roughly the same orientation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.6209/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning — mentioned by cs702</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4163429</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1112.6209:4163429</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:26:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The system apparently did not require any training by humans; instead, it learned to catalog different types of images, including those of human faces, on its own. (In other words, all images were unlabeled.) Paper here: http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6209v3 [UPDATE: fixed erroneous statement.]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.6209/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning — mentioned by yk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4160198</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1112.6209:4160198</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 03:52:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The original article appears is http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6209 (as noted in the article). I did only print it (yet), but from the abstract it appears that they did mainly tried face recognition, not trying to find cats.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.6209/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4041693</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1112.6209:4041693</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:37:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Google research (with Jeff Dean): Face recognition with unsupervised learning&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.6209/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
