HackerPapers

arXiv:1112.4522quant-ph

A Very Common Fallacy in Quantum Mechanics: Superposition, Delayed Choice, Quantum Erasers, Retrocausality, and All That

David Ellerman

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

There is a very common fallacy, here called the separation fallacy, that is involved in the interpretation of quantum experiments involving a certain type of separation such as the: double-slit experiments, which-way interferometer experiments, polarization analyzer experiments, Stern-Gerlach experiments, and quantum eraser experiments. It is the separation fallacy that leads not only to flawed textbook accounts of these experiments but to flawed inferences about retrocausality in the context of "delayed choice" versions of separation experiments.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2022 to Oct 2022.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • > Delayed-choice experiments demonstrate the seeming ability of measurements in the present to alter events occurring in the past. No, they don't. https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.4522

      bondarchukView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.