<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for the MSSM and Low-Scale SUSY Breaking · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.3068/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.3068/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for the MSSM and Low-Scale SUSY Breaking — mentioned by seanhunter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39753872</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1112.3068:39753872</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:33:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree but very much with your caveat. If you study the mathematics of some sort of abstract structure you are doing research in pure maths. That is a worthy and completely legitimate pursuit and a ton of stuff started life as pure abstract mathematical research and ended up having real-world benefits way down the line that noone could have forseen.[1] If on the other hand you say that abstract structure is a fundamental building block of the universe and, say, unifies the standard model with gravity etc but actually your theory isn&amp;#x27;t explaining anything observable I would say that isn&amp;#x27;t…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.3068/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
