<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How a wave function can collapse without violating Schroedinger's equation, and how to understand Born's rule · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.1811/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.1811/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How a wave function can collapse without violating Schroedinger's equation, and how to understand Born's rule — mentioned by miltondts</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10230602</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1112.1811:10230602</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 23:10:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Some physicists argue that there might not be such thing as independence even with &amp;quot;quasars which are located diametrically opposite to one another&amp;quot;[1]. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.1811 - page 12&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1112.1811/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
