https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1111.3597/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46713614urn:hackerpapers:mention:1111.3597:46713614Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:24:15 GMT<p>While useful it needs a big red warning to potential leakers. If they were personally served documents (such as via email, while logged in, etc) there really isn&#x27;t much that can be done to ascertain the safety of leaking it. It&#x27;s not even safe if there are two or more leakers and they &quot;compare notes&quot; to try and &quot;clean&quot; something for release. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traitor_tracing#Watermarking https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3597 The watermark can even be contained in the wording itself (multiple versions of sentences, word choice etc stores the entropy). The only moderately safe thing to…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1111.3597/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CR