<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Removing Orbital Debris with Lasers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.3835/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.3835/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Removing Orbital Debris with Lasers — mentioned by PaulHoule</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40717610</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1110.3835:40717610</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:28:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It is not always cheap to change orbit around Earth, the old Heinlein quote: &amp;quot;If you can get your ship into orbit, you&amp;#x27;re halfway to anywhere.&amp;quot; is mostly wrong. If you wanted to send up a satellite to pick up little bits of trash and bring them to one place for processing you would have to use fuel to maneuver from one to another: it is cheap to change the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_anomaly but other orbit changes in LEO can be about as expensive as launching a rocket up from Earth. There is no point, for instance, in sending a cargo to the space station and then launching it in a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.3835/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.space-ph</category></item><item><title>Removing Orbital Debris with Lasers — mentioned by hwbehrens</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24225957</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1110.3835:24225957</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:32:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously the best way to avoid Kessler syndrome is to prevent it from occurring in the first place, but given the widespread short-termism everywhere these days, that seems naïve. Are laser brooms the current state of the art when it comes to deorbiting? From this article [0], it appears to be quite slow but at least highly parallel, &amp;quot;cleaning&amp;quot; an object in 3-4 years but all addressable objects in ~5 years. It&amp;#x27;s still unclear to me if the principles required for them to function effectively are currently available, or if more development is required first. Another concern is that large…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.3835/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.space-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
