<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Can apparent superluminal neutrino speeds be explained as a quantum weak measurement? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.2832/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.2832/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Can apparent superluminal neutrino speeds be explained as a quantum weak measurement? — mentioned by exe34</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41974973</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1110.2832:41974973</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:17:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;oh that might be it, two words, they went all out in the final version! edit: no, I must have embellished it in my mind: https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2832&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.2832/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item><item><title>Can apparent superluminal neutrino speeds be explained as a quantum weak measurement? — mentioned by ISL</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18153666</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1110.2832:18153666</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 05:15:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2832 I&amp;#x27;ve seen some with half as many words, but can&amp;#x27;t find them in the time alotted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.2832/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item><item><title>Can apparent superluminal neutrino speeds be explained as a quantum weak measurement? — mentioned by Jugurtha</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13258593</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1110.2832:13258593</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 15:48:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed, I was agreeably surprised as well. I like the &amp;quot;Bottom Line Up Front&amp;quot; style. Speaking of abstracts ... https://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.2832.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.2832/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item><item><title>Can apparent superluminal neutrino speeds be explained as a quantum weak measurement? — mentioned by Toucan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3772220</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1110.2832:3772220</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:53:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2832 A superb example.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.2832/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item><item><title>Can apparent superluminal neutrino speeds be explained as a quantum weak measurement? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3116777</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1110.2832:3116777</guid><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:15:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The most informative abstract ever (re: speeding neutrinos)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.2832/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
