<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Atomic clock with nuclear transition: current status in TU Wien · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.0741/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.0741/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Atomic clock with nuclear transition: current status in TU Wien — mentioned by Daniel_Newby</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7149385</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1110.0741:7149385</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 06:56:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0741 http://www.thorium.at/?page_id=4 I could not find many references, but I think clocks mainly make the instrument cheaper, or possible in the case of long-baseline satellite instruments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1110.0741/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.atom-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
