<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Early Phishing · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1106.4692/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1106.4692/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Early Phishing — mentioned by mpg515</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15675075</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1106.4692:15675075</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:05:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Ancient articles such as this one always bring kiddos out of the woodwork. I&amp;#x27;m happy for that because it totally validates all the time I spent on that wretched network. Fun fact: Da Chronic is a cool dude (shout out #pain) and also wrote this fun thing about phishing: https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.4692&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1106.4692/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Early Phishing — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10577915</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1106.4692:10577915</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:53:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Early Phishing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1106.4692/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
