<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Philosophical Treatise of Universal Induction · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1105.5721/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1105.5721/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Philosophical Treatise of Universal Induction — mentioned by rsaarelm</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9868636</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1105.5721:9868636</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2015 05:25:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Solomonoff induction seems to be an useful innate bias for the current approaches at general intelligence. It&amp;#x27;s basically a formalization of Occam&amp;#x27;s razor that states that instead of being completely random, the surrounding environment is mostly lawful and simple, and therefore most of the processes in it can be described by algorithms with short rather than long source code. Hutter has written a bit about NFL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.3846.pdf http://arxiv.org/pdf/1105.5721.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1105.5721/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
