HackerPapers

arXiv:1105.4714quant-ph

Observation of the Dynamical Casimir Effect in a Superconducting Circuit

C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, J. R. Johansson, T. Duty, F. Nori, P. Delsing

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

One of the most surprising predictions of modern quantum theory is that the vacuum of space is not empty. In fact, quantum theory predicts that it teems with virtual particles flitting in and out of existence. While initially a curiosity, it was quickly realized that these vacuum fluctuations had measurable consequences, for instance producing the Lamb shift of atomic spectra and modifying the magnetic moment for the electron. This type of renormalization due to vacuum fluctuations is now central to our understanding of nature. However, these effects provide indirect evidence for the existence of vacuum fluctuations. From early on, it was discussed if it might instead be possible to more directly observe the virtual particles that compose the quantum vacuum. 40 years ago, Moore suggested that a mirror undergoing relativistic motion could convert virtual photons into directly observable real photons. This effect was later named the dynamical Casimir effect (DCE). Using a superconducting circuit, we have observed the DCE for the first time. The circuit consists of a coplanar transmission line with an electrical length that can be changed at a few percent of the speed of light. The length is changed by modulating the inductance of a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) at high frequencies (~11 GHz). In addition to observing the creation of real photons, we observe two-mode squeezing of the emitted radiation, which is a signature of the quantum character of the generation process.

arXiv comments
12 pages, 3 figures
Journal reference
Nature 479, 376-379 (2011)
DOI
doi:10.1038/nature10561
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Nov 2011 to Nov 2011. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2011 to May 2011. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Umm, I'd like to give the scientists involved a benefit of the doubt. The probability that they don't know what they're doing is much lower than the probability that a popularized article about their study is incomplete and/or inaccurate. The actual paper is available at arxiv…

      SharlinView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.