<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Revival of White Holes as Small Bangs · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1105.2776/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1105.2776/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Revival of White Holes as Small Bangs — mentioned by stephancoral</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13523312</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1105.2776:13523312</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:47:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed, but there is research underway to find evidence: &amp;lt;&amp;lt; Black holes are extremely dense and compact objects from which light cannot escape. There is an overall consensus that black holes exist and many astronomical objects are identified with black holes. White holes were understood as the exact time reversal of black holes, therefore they should continuously throw away material. It is accepted, however, that a persistent ejection of mass leads to gravitational pressure, the formation of a black hole and thus to the &amp;quot;death of while holes&amp;quot;. So far, no astronomical source has been…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1105.2776/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.gen-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
