<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Generalizations of the Tree Packing Conjecture · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1104.0642/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1104.0642/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Generalizations of the Tree Packing Conjecture — mentioned by sdenton4</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22679318</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1104.0642:22679318</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:40:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I, uh, wasted a bit of time once on the Tree Packing conjecture of Gyarfas: https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.0642 In your left hand, place a complete graph, which has n-choose-2 edges. In your right hand, a collection of trees on 2, 3, 4, ..., n-1 vertices, which, by miraculous concidence, also has n-choose-2 edges. Q: Can you pack the trees into a complete graph with no overlapping edges?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1104.0642/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
