<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A 3% Solution: Determination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space Telescope and Wide Field Camera 3 · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1103.2976/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1103.2976/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A 3% Solution: Determination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space Telescope and Wide Field Camera 3 — mentioned by sanxiyn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39678257</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1103.2976:39678257</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:23:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Error analysis of cosmic distance ladder is fiercely technical subject. https://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2976 Table 5 is titled &amp;quot;H0 Error Budget for Cepheid and SN Ia Distance Ladders&amp;quot;. (It is old and the field is moving fast, but this is what I happened to remember.) Among total error of 3.1%, Cepheid reddening is 1.4% and the second largest source of uncertainty. SN Ia statistics is the largest with 1.9%. Rarely discussed in popular treatment is anchor distance, the third largest source with 1.3%. It is uncertainty of bottom lungs of the ladder, eg the distance to Large Magellanic Cloud before…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1103.2976/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
