<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Polynomial evaluation over finite fields: new algorithms and complexity bounds · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1102.4772/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1102.4772/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Polynomial evaluation over finite fields: new algorithms and complexity bounds — mentioned by stevefan1999</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45830694</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1102.4772:45830694</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 02:25:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As someone who used std::simd in an attempt for submitting to an academic conference CFP*, I have look deep into how std::simd and I would conclude that there are a couple of reasons it isn&amp;#x27;t stable yet (this is rather long and maybe need 10 minutes to read): 1. It is highly depending on LLVM intrinsics which itself can change quite a lot. Sometimes the intrinsic would even fail to instantiate and crashed the entire compilation. I for example met chronic ICE crashes for the same code in different nightly Rust version. Then I realize it is because the SIMD operation was too complicated and I…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1102.4772/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.IT</category></item></channel></rss>
