arXiv:1102.3523cs.DL
PaperBricks: An Alternative to Complete-Story Peer Reviewing
Abstract
The peer review system as used in several computer science communities has several flaws including long review times, overloaded reviewers, as well as fostering of niche topics. These flaws decrease quality, lower impact, slowdown the innovation process, and lead to frustration of authors, readers, and reviewers. In order to fix this, we propose a new peer review system termed paper bricks. Paper bricks has several advantages over the existing system including shorter publications, better competition for new ideas, as well as an accelerated innovation process. Furthermore, paper bricks may be implemented with minimal change to the existing peer review systems.
I've always hoped that the PaperBricks, http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.3523 model would catch on. My summary of the idea: There is an awful lot of redundancy and wasted effort that goes into most papers. From introductions that need to be rewritten every time (when linking to a solid…
jsweojtjView on HNParent context
TL;DR for PaperBricks: "Formalize the structure of papers, such that each paper is composed of one or many (clearly marked) of the following "sections" ("bricks"): symbol description my description "I" Introduction ("domain intro") "PS" Problem Statement ("specific problem")…
akavelView on HNParent context