<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A New Limit on Planck Scale Lorentz Violation from Gamma-ray Burst Polarization · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1102.2784/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1102.2784/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A New Limit on Planck Scale Lorentz Violation from Gamma-ray Burst Polarization — mentioned by ChrisLomont</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16217704</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1102.2784:16217704</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:07:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;Other leading theories are non-continuous. Which theories discretize all variables? I&amp;#x27;m well aware people make models all the time, but they usually fail to explain all we observe or are toy models, like 2D TQFT models, not designed to mirror reality, but to fiddle with to see if they extend. LQG, for example, treats space as quantized at the Plank length, but this has already been disproven experimentally [1,2], forcing LQG to reassess. LQG still has continuous parameters, such as symmetry, and is based on the same continuous math as GR and TQFTs. It&amp;#x27;s simply trying to discretize (somewhat)…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1102.2784/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.HE</category></item></channel></rss>
