<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Radio beam vorticity and orbital angular momentum · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.6015/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.6015/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Radio beam vorticity and orbital angular momentum — mentioned by jpdoctor</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3656885</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1101.6015:3656885</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:31:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The arxiv paper quoted therein: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1101.6015v1.pdf I, for one, think this is neat stuff. (Practicality might well be a different matter.) Poynting himself mentioned the angular momentum present -- From the arxiv paper: Poynting, J. H. The wave motion of a revolving shaft, and a suggestion as to the angular momentum in a beam of circularly polarised light. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 82, 560–567 (1909). The presence of &amp;quot;suggestion&amp;quot; in the title is also interesting. Wish I had time to dig through this history.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.6015/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item></channel></rss>
