<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and Twitter · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.5120/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.5120/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and Twitter — mentioned by chime</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5242993</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1101.5120:5242993</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:38:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The best part about this is how they calculated happiness from each tweet: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1101.5120.pdf &amp;gt; we avoid stemming words, i.e., conflating inflected words with their root form, such as all conjugations of a speci c verb. For verbs in particular, by focusing on the most fre- quent words, we obtained scores for those conjuga- tions likely to appear in texts, obviating any need for stemming. Moreover, while we observe stemming works well in some cases for happiness measures, e.g., havg(advance)=6.58, havg(advanced)=6.58, and havg(advances)=6.24, it fails badly in others, e.g.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.5120/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
