<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Physics of the Riemann Hypothesis · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.3116/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.3116/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Physics of the Riemann Hypothesis — mentioned by eindiran</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22250422</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1101.3116:22250422</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 19:55:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;At the beginning of the article, it mentions the phrase &amp;quot;the 5th state of matter&amp;quot;, which I&amp;#x27;ve heard before; personally, I find it quite misleading. Even if you exclude all of the intermediary states and all of the non-classical states (things like glasses and liquid crystals), there are a lot of exotic states of matter. The Wikipedia page for &amp;quot;States of matter&amp;quot; includes a lot of them[0]. Though perhaps the idea is that there is something fundamental enough about the Bode-Einstein condensate that it should count as the fifth fundamental state of matter? On an unrelated note, its interesting to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.3116/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math-ph</category></item><item><title>Physics of the Riemann Hypothesis — mentioned by mrcactu5</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6543456</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1101.3116:6543456</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:57:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;from what i&amp;#x27;ve heard attempts to prove the Riemann hypothesis this way have been a dead end. mathematicians agree the heuristics concerning random matrices and quantum chaos are true but Physics of the Riemann Hypothesis http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.3116 Quantum chaos, random matrix theory, and the Riemann zeta-function http://www.math.harvard.edu/~bourgade/papers/PoincareSeminar... The quantum physics methods being used to solve the Riemann hypothesis can solve easier number theory problems as well. We can look at the structure of the primes more directly.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.3116/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
