<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Preliminary Inconclusive Hint of Evidence Against Optimal Fine Tuning of the Cosmological Constant for Maximizing the Fraction of Baryons Becoming Life · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.2444/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.2444/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Preliminary Inconclusive Hint of Evidence Against Optimal Fine Tuning of the Cosmological Constant for Maximizing the Fraction of Baryons Becoming Life — mentioned by bediger</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2632922</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1101.2444:2632922</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:06:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A paper that argues against any &amp;quot;fine tuning&amp;quot; of the universe to support life: http://search.arxiv.org:8081/paper.jsp?r=1101.2444&amp;amp;qid=n... I&amp;#x27;m not sure how arxiv.org work, but the paper is arXiv:1101.2444 just in case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.2444/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
