<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Complexity of 3SAT_N and the P versus NP Problem · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.2018/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.2018/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Complexity of 3SAT_N and the P versus NP Problem — mentioned by chucknthem</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2121805</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1101.2018:2121805</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:45:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Just this months there&amp;#x27;s another paper on arXive that uses 3-SAT to proove P!=NP http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.2018 A list of articles published on the P=NP debate is here http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP.htm Looks like someone thinks they&amp;#x27;ve solved the problem every month or so :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.2018/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item></channel></rss>
