<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Amplifying Single-Photon Nonlinearity Using Weak Measurement · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.0199/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.0199/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Amplifying Single-Photon Nonlinearity Using Weak Measurement — mentioned by starwed</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3177237</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1101.0199:3177237</guid><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:12:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Why does the author insist on using &amp;#x27;we&amp;#x27; as if he were an author of the study? I found that very confusing... (I&amp;#x27;d find it more acceptable if a physical experiment were being discussed, but this seems to be a theoretical result.) Oh, here&amp;#x27;s the arxiv link: http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.0199&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1101.0199/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
