<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Convex Geometry of Linear Inverse Problems · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1012.0621/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1012.0621/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Convex Geometry of Linear Inverse Problems — mentioned by jey</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16635011</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1012.0621:16635011</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 03:06:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Close, but not quite: compressed sensing really works in a lot of domains. You &amp;quot;just&amp;quot; have to know of a basis set in which your signal is sparse. This basis set can be (and often is) overcomplete; i.e. you don&amp;#x27;t need a minimal orthogonal set of basis functions. So if you know that &amp;quot;most pixels of an MRI are black&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;music only has a few non-zero Fourier frequencies&amp;quot;, you can apply compressed sensing techniques to recover/reconstruct the underlying signal. This is a fairly mild and merely structural form of a priori side information, as opposed to having to know detailed precise prior…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1012.0621/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.OC</category></item></channel></rss>
