<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Informational derivation of Quantum Theory · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1011.6451/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1011.6451/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Informational derivation of Quantum Theory — mentioned by cevi</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28896856</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1011.6451:28896856</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2021 14:49:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Unlike perpetual motion or free energy, the math and physics behind quantum computing is rock solid - the possibility is baked into the framework of quantum mechanics at an absolutely fundamental level. Even if it turned out that all of quantum field theory was completely bogus, I would still expect the basic framework of quantum mechanics (i.e. unitary evolution, the Born rule for converting amplitudes to probabilities, density matrices describing mixed states) to be correct. If quantum computing was not possible, that would mean that everything we thought we knew about physics was…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1011.6451/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Informational derivation of Quantum Theory — mentioned by Sniffnoy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9097403</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1011.6451:9097403</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:14:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s a link to the referenced paper on arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.6451&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1011.6451/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
