<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Concentric circles in WMAP data may provide evidence of violent pre-Big-Bang activity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1011.3706/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1011.3706/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Concentric circles in WMAP data may provide evidence of violent pre-Big-Bang activity — mentioned by dagss</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17893389</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1011.3706:17893389</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 18:59:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I would be very sceptical of data analysis papers with Penrose&amp;#x27;s name on them. Penrose &amp;amp; Gurzadyan committed this travesty: https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.3706 ...and the entire CMB analysis community quickly rushed to point out the numerous basic errors done in the statistical analysis. E.g. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2041-8205/733/2/L2... Gurzadyan &amp;amp; Penrose wrote the kind of paper that should never have passed basic peer review. And even when &amp;quot;everyone&amp;quot; pointed out Gurzadyan does not have a clue about data analysis they still stuck to it. I have no idea about this paper and if…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1011.3706/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item><item><title>Concentric circles in WMAP data may provide evidence of violent pre-Big-Bang activity — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1945340</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1011.3706:1945340</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:24:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;pre-Big-Bang activity evidence&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;51 points; 19 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1011.3706/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
