HackerPapers

arXiv:1011.1547cs.SI

Being Rational or Aggressive? A Revisit to Dunbar's Number in Online Social Networks

Jichang Zhao, Junjie Wu, Guannan Liu, Ke Xu, Guoqing Chen

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the explosion of online social networks (OSNs). They provide powerful IT-innovations for online social activities such as organizing contacts, publishing contents, and sharing interests between friends who may never meet before. As more and more people become the active users of online social networks, one may ponder questions such as: (1) Do OSNs indeed improve our sociability? (2) To what extent can we expand our offline social spectrum in OSNs? (3) Can we identify some interesting user behaviors in OSNs? Our work in this paper just aims to answer these interesting questions. To this end, we pay a revisit to the well-known Dunbar's number in online social networks. Our main research contributions are as follows. First, to our best knowledge, our work is the first one that systematically validates the existence of the online Dunbar's number in the range of [200,300]. To reach this, we combine using local-structure analysis and user-interaction analysis for extensive real-world OSNs. Second, we divide OSNs users into two categories: rational and aggressive, and find that rational users intend to develop close and reciprocated relationships, whereas aggressive users have no consistent behaviors. Third, we build a simple model to capture the constraints of time and cognition that affect the evolution of online social networks. Finally, we show the potential use of our findings in viral marketing and privacy management in online social networks.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.SISocial and Information Networks physics.soc-phPhysics and Society

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2022 to Oct 2022.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • "Large group" could be as small as 200 or 300, or perhaps as low as 151. A website operator who wants to publish pages managed and edited by 150 of his "friends" would be acceptable. A website operator who wants to hand out pages to 100,000 people would not be acceptable.…

      1vuio0pswjnm7View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.