arXiv:1011.0423q-fin.GN2010-11-01

A note comprising a negative resolution of the Efficient Market Hypothesis

Robert Viragh

Abstract

This note comprises a negative resolution of the Efficient Market Hypothesis.

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Jun 2018 to May 2020.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Kindly Stop Saying the Efficient Market Hypothesis Is Dead May 20201 comment
- It might interest some people here to know that if the EMH were true, you could use it to break unbreakable cryptography. However that's not what would happen. If you tried it, your crack would fail, and you would just end up proving experimentally that EMH isn't true. That…
  
  fdsakjfsdfjMay 31, 2020View on HN Parent context
P = NP Proofs: Advice to claimers Apr 20191 comment
- I'm a crank. I found this article very valuable. In 2010 I put online a brief refutation of the EMH, the efficient market hypothesis. Here it is: https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.0423 If I had seen this then, I think I would have followed the directions in the inset box, where the…
  
  viraghrrApr 22, 2019View on HN Parent context
Markets are efficient if and only if P = NP (2010) Jun 20181 comment
- Have another account here but don't want to take the karma hit for being a crank. I published this 2-page proof that the EMH is false: https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.0423 (didn't set the date so in the document it's wrong, this was published 2010.) It doesn't depend on P = NP, it's…
  
  viraghrJun 1, 2018View on HN Parent context

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.