<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Black-hole binaries, gravitational waves, and numerical relativity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1010.5260/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1010.5260/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Black-hole binaries, gravitational waves, and numerical relativity — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34968968</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1010.5260:34968968</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:22:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;In a Kerr black hole spacetime there is no orbital angular momentum (OAM, L), only the intrinsic spin angular momentum (SAM, S). One can get OAM in a relativistic n-body black hole problem. Each of those black holes will have its own SAM. See §5.11. ANGULAR MOMENTUM in Misner, Thorne &amp;amp; Wheeler (MTW) and in particular Box 5.6 D (Intrinsic Angular Momentum) and E (Decomposition of Angular Momentum into Intrinsic and Orbital Parts). The latter gives J = L + S. Admittedly, in MTW §33 the authors prefer to use S (e.g. eqn. 33.4) but that raises the important caveat for binary black hole (BBH)…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1010.5260/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
