<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Problem of Time in Quantum Gravity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1009.2157/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1009.2157/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Problem of Time in Quantum Gravity — mentioned by mutant_glofish</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36035489</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1009.2157:36035489</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 19:17:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; It means we&amp;#x27;ve discovered the actual fundamentals of several areas. But there is some evidence that this is not the case. For example, quantum field theory and general relativity are not quite compatible. [1][2] The mechanism for charge formation in triboelectric effect (when you rub things together) isn&amp;#x27;t well-understood. [3][4] Turbulence still cannot be analyzed satisfactorily. [5] This last one is even mentioned in the Feynman Lectures [6]. Also, generally, I think we should be very skeptical of the claim that we live at the pinnacle of human achievement and the end of the history. It…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1009.2157/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>The Problem of Time in Quantum Gravity — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13096304</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1009.2157:13096304</guid><pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 16:37:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The article&amp;#x27;s a bit scattered but its central theme seems to be the Problem of Time. There&amp;#x27;s a wikipedia article on that, of course, and it&amp;#x27;s not so bad. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_time The structure of the the paragraph you quoted and the one following it is similar to the first two long paragraphs under the &amp;quot;Proposed solutions to the problem of time&amp;quot; section of the wikipedia article. There is a bit more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_quantum_gravity#The_... and a technical overview in the first section of https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.2157 I wrote &amp;quot;seems&amp;quot;, because…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1009.2157/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
