<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The fine structure constant and numerical alchemy · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1009.1711/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1009.1711/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The fine structure constant and numerical alchemy — mentioned by T-A</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18537451</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1009.1711:18537451</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 22:31:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I have never seen a physicist put that particular number on a wall (these days, the cosmological constant would be a better bet). I am vaguely aware of numerological attempts (some collected in [1]) to &amp;quot;explain&amp;quot; why 137 is &amp;quot;special&amp;quot;, none of which has ever led anywhere. As far as I can tell, the fascination with it got started by the number being close to an integer, and maybe the remark in [1] that &amp;quot;In ancient Hebraic language letters where used for numbers, and Cabbala is the word corresponding to 137&amp;quot; played a role. But we know that it isn&amp;#x27;t an integer, and that it runs [2] like any…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1009.1711/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.gen-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
