HackerPapers

arXiv:1007.3018math.HO

When is .999... less than 1?

Karin Usadi Katz, Mikhail G. Katz

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We examine alternative interpretations of the symbol described as nought, point, nine recurring. Is "an infinite number of 9s" merely a figure of speech? How are such alternative interpretations related to infinite cardinalities? How are they expressed in Lightstone's "semicolon" notation? Is it possible to choose a canonical alternative interpretation? Should unital evaluation of the symbol .999 . . . be inculcated in a pre-limit teaching environment? The problem of the unital evaluation is hereby examined from the pre-R, pre-lim viewpoint of the student.

arXiv comments
28 pages
Journal reference
Montana Mathematics Enthusiast 7 (2010), 3--30
DOI
Subjects
math.HOHistory and Overview

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Apr 2014 to Apr 2014.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Of course that argument only applies when talking about the standard real number system. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1007.3018.pdf?origin=publication_detail http://arxiv.org/pdf/0811.0164.pdf ...of course you can make a pretty good case that uncountable, uncomputable, unnameable…

      GregBuchholzView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.