<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Von Neumann's 'No Hidden Variables' Proof: A Re-Appraisal · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1006.0499/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1006.0499/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Von Neumann's 'No Hidden Variables' Proof: A Re-Appraisal — mentioned by DalasNoin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27208499</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1006.0499:27208499</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 13:46:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting citation, I had heard of John Bell&amp;#x27;s theorem, which disproves local hidden variable theories. But I did not know that von Neumann had his own attempt at disproving these theories. Researching this a little further, I also found people arguing that von Neumanns arguments were misconstrued by Bell. https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.0499 I wonder how Grete Hermann&amp;#x27;s arguments compare to the arguments from Bell and what the real truth is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1006.0499/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
