HackerPapers

arXiv:1005.5173quant-ph

No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power

Roger Colbeck, Renato Renner

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

According to quantum theory, measurements generate random outcomes, in stark contrast with classical mechanics. This raises the question of whether there could exist an extension of the theory which removes this indeterminism, as suspected by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR). Although this has been shown to be impossible, existing results do not imply that the current theory is maximally informative. Here we ask the more general question of whether any improved predictions can be achieved by any extension of quantum theory. Under the assumption that measurements can be chosen freely, we answer this question in the negative: no extension of quantum theory can give more information about the outcomes of future measurements than quantum theory itself. Our result has significance for the foundations of quantum mechanics, as well as applications to tasks that exploit the inherent randomness in quantum theory, such as quantum cryptography.

arXiv comments
6 pages plus 7 of supplementary material, 3 figures. Title changed. Added discussion on Bell's notion of locality. FAQ answered at http://perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/rcolbeck/FAQ.html
Journal reference
Nature Communications 2, 411 (2011)
DOI
doi:10.1038/ncomms1416
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics physics.data-anData Analysis, Statistics and Probability

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2013 to Aug 2013. Found in 1 HN submission from Aug 2013 to Aug 2013. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • > but how can we know for sure that it's intrinsic randomness? We can't be sure (even though Luboš Motl disagrees). The universe may not be intrinsically random if superdeterminism is true. However, this isn't a popular idea in physics; in fact Gerard t'Hooft is the only Nobel…

      XcelerateView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.