HackerPapers

arXiv:1005.4172math-ph

A Derivation of Special Relativity from Causal Sets

Kevin H. Knuth, Newshaw Bahrenyi

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We present a novel derivation of special relativity based on the information physics of events comprising a causal set. We postulate that events are fundamental, and that some events have the potential to receive information about other events, but not vice versa. This leads to the concept of a partially-ordered set of events, which is called a causal set. Quantification proceeds by selecting two chains of coordinated events, each of which represents an observer, and assigning a valuation to each chain. Events can be projected onto each chain by identifying the earliest event on the chain that can be informed about the event. In this way, each event can be quantified by a pair of numbers, referred to a pair, that derives from the valuations on the chains. Pairs can be decomposed into a sum of symmetric and antisymmetric pairs, which correspond to time-like and space-like coordinates. From this pair, we derive a scalar measure and show that this is the Minkowski metric. The Lorentz transformations follow, as well as the fact that speed is a relevant quantity relating two inertial frames, and that there exists a maximal speed, which is invariant in all inertial frames. All results follow directly from the Event Postulate and the adopted quantification scheme.

arXiv comments
19 pages, 7 figures. v2 includes corrections to derivation of Lorentz transformation, and a discussion of the origin of spin 1/2
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
math-phMathematical Physics gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology hep-thHigh Energy Physics, Theory

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 4 comments across 4 threads, from Oct 2011 to Jun 2017.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments4 threads

    • Which relativity? :) No idea about Wolfram but special relativity doesn't need very many assumptions; you can do it if all you assume are causal sets and a quantification scheme: https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4172 And since Conway's GoL is Turing-complete, you could maybe construct…

      JachView on HNParent context

    • http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4172 c is a bit more established than "scientific fact" like the behavior of atoms were once thought to be, it is very mathematical, as is the curvature of the earth being > 0. In principle new data could come in showing these things to be false, in the…

      JachView on HNParent context

    • You might find this paper interesting: A Derivation of Special Relativity from Causal Sets--http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4172 It doesn't answer why c is the value of c, but it's an interesting way to show that there must be an invariant bounding speed limit. It doesn't assume the…

      JachView on HNParent context

    • I don't really get why you're being downvoted to oblivion, that's a great stance to take on science in general. So much media buzz is made over n=1 things; you can cut out a lot from your information diet by ignoring things until they get replication. If special relativity is…

      JachView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.