<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Polylogarithmic Approximation for Edit Distance and the Asymmetric Query Complexity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.4033/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.4033/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Polylogarithmic Approximation for Edit Distance and the Asymmetric Query Complexity — mentioned by grantwu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23061519</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1005.4033:23061519</guid><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2020 20:13:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you point to a source that defines Levenstein distance as only referring to bitstreams? A translation of the original article [1] that introduced the concept notes in a footnote that &amp;quot;the definitions given below are also meaningful if the code is taken to mean an arbitrary set of words (possibly of different lengths) in some alphabet containing r letters (r &amp;gt;= 2)&amp;quot;. And if you wish to strictly stick to how it was originally defined, you&amp;#x27;d need to only use strings of the same length. More recent sources [2] say instead &amp;quot;over some alphabet&amp;quot;, and even in the first footnote, describe results…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.4033/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item></channel></rss>
