<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.3035/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.3035/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement — mentioned by lopsotronic</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39084997</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1005.3035:39084997</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 01:29:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My &amp;quot;cognitive white noise generator&amp;quot; has been locked on emergent spacetime for a decade now. The idea here, and I&amp;#x27;m very loosely summarizing, is that the dimensions themselves are emergent properties of large scale entanglement - the mathematical &amp;quot;dimensions&amp;quot; resolve quite well into flesh and blood, &amp;quot;this is a chair&amp;quot; dimensions. The paper that sort of kicked it off https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3035 Quite evocative, but would require spectacularly sensitive testing apparatus to falsify . . and even then, other explanations aplenty. It is the fabric of space, after all, no shortage of theories.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.3035/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement — mentioned by zachf</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33734398</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1005.3035:33734398</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:06:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the most important papers in this field is [0]. (As is common in science, it built on a long history of nearby ideas, e.g. [1].) An important calculation done around this idea is presented in [2], in which remarkable progress is made on Hawking&amp;#x27;s black hole information paradox. All of these papers have some amount of mathematical backing, but you&amp;#x27;ll find plenty of formulas and calculations in [2]! [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0533 [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3035 [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10996&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.3035/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement — mentioned by mikhailfranco</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21133875</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1005.3035:21133875</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2019 06:34:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I think SW became too obsessed with the mathematical and computational approach to CA, while (as usual) &amp;#x27;t Hooft pursued his physics intuitions to create a candidate CA theory: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.1548 I say as usual, because G&amp;#x27;tH had already formulated the holographic principles that would allow space-time (hence GTR) to be encoded non-locally over a graph. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9310026 There need not be a preferred reference frame if the space-time events do not occur at individual nodes in the graph, but emerge at scales much larger than the graph, with some holographic or…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.3035/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement — mentioned by ivan_ah</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6135301</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1005.3035:6135301</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:19:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The links to the original papers: older one: http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3035v1 recent one: http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0533 Very cool. The paper suggests a connection between the non-local properties of EPR pairs and the non-local properties of wormholes that connect distant regions of space time. EPR pair = Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pair, e.g. |Phi〉 = |0〉⊗|0〉+ |1〉⊗ |1〉. (1) The vectors to the left of ⊗ represent the state of Alice, the vectors to the right of the ⊗ represent Bob&amp;#x27;s state. The + in the equation refers to the notion of quantum superposition. There is nothing mysterious about quantum…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.3035/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
