<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Closed timelike curves via post-selection: theory and experimental demonstration · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.2219/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.2219/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Closed timelike curves via post-selection: theory and experimental demonstration — mentioned by TchoBeer</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33816532</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1005.2219:33816532</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 14:21:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m loving Scott Aaronson rolling his eyes at this. He actually had a whole section on this in his book for a similar experiment in 2010 on closed timelike curves https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2219. I feel bad for actual quantum computing experts, we&amp;#x27;re living through a weird quantum hype moment and they have to combat the quantum hype machine making absurd claims on one side and the quantum skeptics saying that quantum computing is useless on the other.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1005.2219/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
