<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>FACETS - a Framework for Parallel Coupling of Fusion Components · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1004.1611/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1004.1611/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>FACETS - a Framework for Parallel Coupling of Fusion Components — mentioned by rubidium</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3374455</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1004.1611:3374455</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:16:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We definitely have the science to describe this. It just happens to be very complicated. You&amp;#x27;re right in that it&amp;#x27;s a mixture of E&amp;amp;M, thermodynamics, and fluid mechanics. Whether it becomes computationally prohibitive to model is something I am unsure of, but may be possible with some simplifying assumptions. Edit: after a bit more research, I found a paper where, if I follow correctly, they are laying out a framework for creating such a model: http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.1611&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1004.1611/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.plasm-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
